We Finally Know Who Was Running The Biden White House

In partnership with

Start learning AI in 2025

Everyone talks about AI, but no one has the time to learn it. So, we found the easiest way to learn AI in as little time as possible: The Rundown AI.

It's a free AI newsletter that keeps you up-to-date on the latest AI news, and teaches you how to apply it in just 5 minutes a day.

Plus, complete the quiz after signing up and they’ll recommend the best AI tools, guides, and courses – tailored to your needs.

Sign up to start learning.

Unbelievable. In the labyrinthine corridors of American politics, the revelation that a non-elected figure, Anthony Bernal, allegedly ran the Biden White House has sparked a firestorm of controversy and scrutiny. This startling claim, emerging from an undercover investigation by Project Veritas, paints a picture of a government ostensibly led by President Joe Biden but covertly steered by shadowy operatives outside the traditional democratic process.

The implications of such a scenario are profound, raising questions about transparency, accountability, and the very essence of democratic governance. Anthony Bernal, officially listed as Jill Biden's Chief of Staff, has been thrust into the spotlight not for his formal role but for the extraordinary influence he purportedly wielded behind the scenes. According to the investigation, Bernal operated as a "shadowy, Wizard of Oz-type figure," a description that evokes images of a puppet master pulling strings from behind a curtain.

And this isn’t coming from some random person. This is coming from Democrat darling David Hogg’s mouth.

This characterization is not merely hyperbolic; it suggests a deliberate obfuscation of power, where decisions of national importance were made not by elected officials but by unelected advisors. Such a state of affairs is antithetical to the principles of democracy, which demand that power be vested in those chosen by the electorate. The Democratic Party, which has long championed transparency and accountability, finds itself at the center of this storm.

The party's failure to prevent or address the ascendancy of such figures is a damning indictment of its commitment to democratic ideals. It is inconceivable that a party that prides itself on representing the will of the people could allow a non-elected individual to exert such control over the executive branch. This lapse is not just a procedural failure but a moral one, betraying the trust of voters who expect their elected leaders to govern, not to be governed by unseen hands. The broader context of this revelation is equally troubling.

The Biden administration has been marred by perceptions of opacity and insularity, with critics arguing that key decisions have been made in a vacuum, insulated from public scrutiny. The presence of a figure like Bernal, described as having "enormous power" and being "scary" to those within the party, exacerbates these concerns. It suggests a culture where fear and secrecy prevail, where the normal checks and balances of democratic governance are undermined by a cabal of unelected insiders. This is not the governance model that Americans were promised, nor is it one that aligns with the party's professed values.

Moreover, the Democratic Party's response to such allegations has been notably tepid. Rather than launching a thorough investigation or demanding accountability, the party appears to have sidestepped the issue, perhaps hoping it would fade from public consciousness. This reticence is a tacit acknowledgment of the problem's gravity, yet it also reveals a disturbing willingness to prioritize political expediency over ethical responsibility. The party's silence speaks volumes, suggesting a complicity in the very practices it should be condemning. The ramifications of this shadowy governance extend beyond the immediate scandal.

They undermine the legitimacy of the Biden administration and, by extension, the Democratic Party itself. When voters cast their ballots, they do so with the expectation that their chosen representatives will wield power. The revelation that an unelected advisor was the de facto decision-maker erodes this trust, fostering cynicism and disillusionment among the electorate.

It is a betrayal of the democratic process, one that the party must confront head-on if it hopes to regain credibility. Furthermore, this incident is not an isolated one but part of a pattern of concerning behavior within the Democratic Party. Recent internal conflicts, such as those involving DNC Vice Chair David Hogg, highlight a party struggling with its own identity and direction. Hogg's allegations against Bernal are particularly damning coming from within the party's ranks, suggesting a deep-seated awareness of the problem that has yet to be addressed.

The party's inability to coalesce around a unified response to these challenges is a sign of weakness, one that its opponents are quick to exploit. In conclusion, the alleged dominance of Anthony Bernal in the Biden White House is a symptom of a larger malaise within the Democratic Party. It reflects a failure to uphold the principles of transparency and accountability that are the bedrock of democratic governance.

The party's acquiescence to such a state of affairs is a grave error, one that risks alienating voters and undermining the very foundations of American democracy. It’s a dereliction of duty and a betrayal of the public's trust.