👀Trump Breaks With Israel, Netanyahu

In partnership with

Big investors are buying this “unlisted” stock

When the founder who sold his last company to Zillow for $120M starts a new venture, people notice. That’s why the same VCs who backed Uber, Venmo, and eBay also invested in Pacaso.

Disrupting the real estate industry once again, Pacaso’s streamlined platform offers co-ownership of premier properties, revamping the $1.3T vacation home market.

And it works. By handing keys to 2,000+ happy homeowners, Pacaso has already made $110M+ in gross profits in their operating history.

Now, after 41% YoY gross profit growth last year alone, they recently reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.

Invest for $2.90/Share

_{Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.}

In a striking departure from the official stance of the Israeli government and its Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Donald Trump has publicly acknowledged the dire humanitarian crisis in Gaza, stating unequivocally that many children in the region are starving. This assertion, made while aboard Air Force One, marks a significant break from the narrative propagated by Netanyahu and some of Israel's most ardent supporters in the United States, who have consistently denied the extent of the starvation crisis in Gaza. Trump's willingness to diverge from this line not only highlights his independent perspective on international issues but also raises critical questions about the efficacy and morality of current Israeli policies towards Gaza.

The context of Trump's statement is rooted in the escalating humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where reports from international organizations such as the World Health Organization have painted a grim picture. According to these reports, 63 individuals have died from malnutrition-related causes in Gaza this year alone, with a staggering 24 of those being children under the age of five. This data underscores the severity of the situation, contradicting claims that there is no starvation in the region. Trump's acknowledgment of this reality is a rare moment of candor from a high-profile American figure, especially given the political sensitivities surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Netanyahu's denial of the starvation crisis in Gaza has been a point of contention, with the Israeli Prime Minister insisting that any reports of hunger are exaggerated or manipulated. This stance aligns with a broader Israeli policy that has been criticized for its stringent blockade of Gaza, which has been in place since 2007 and intensified since October 2023. The blockade has severely restricted the flow of essential supplies, including food, water, medicine, fuel, and electricity, leading to what many experts describe as famine conditions. While Israel justifies these measures as necessary for security, the humanitarian toll has been immense, with millions of Palestinians suffering from acute shortages and deprivation.

Trump's break from this official Israeli policy is noteworthy for several reasons. Firstly, it demonstrates his willingness to form his own views on complex international issues, even when they diverge from those of close allies. This independence is a refreshing contrast to the often-unquestioning support that the U.S. has historically provided to Israeli policies, regardless of their humanitarian impact. By publicly stating that there is "real starvation" in Gaza, Trump challenges the narrative that has been carefully constructed by Netanyahu and his administration, which seeks to downplay the crisis and shift blame to other factors, such as Hamas.

Secondly, Trump's statement can be seen as a subtle critique of Israeli policy itself. While he does not explicitly condemn Israel, his acknowledgment of the starvation crisis implicitly questions the effectiveness of the blockade and the broader strategy of collective punishment that has been employed. This approach is particularly significant given Trump's historical support for Israel, including his decisions to recognize Jerusalem as its capital and to move the U.S. embassy there. His willingness to break from Netanyahu on this issue suggests a recognition that the current policies are not only failing to achieve their intended security goals but are also exacting an unacceptable human cost.

It is important to note that Trump's critique, while welcome, is not without its limitations. As the leader of the free world, his influence could be leveraged to push for more concrete actions to alleviate the suffering in Gaza, such as lifting the blockade or increasing humanitarian aid. However, his statement alone is a step in the right direction, signaling to the international community that the denial of the crisis is no longer tenable. It also serves as a reminder that even staunch allies of Israel must confront the reality of the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza.

In conclusion, Donald Trump's public acknowledgment of the starvation crisis in Gaza represents a significant break from the official Israeli policy and from Benjamin Netanyahu's narrative. It highlights Trump's independent perspective and his willingness to challenge even close allies when he perceives a moral imperative. While Israeli policy has been defended as necessary for security, the humanitarian cost cannot be ignored. Trump's statement is a call to action for the international community to address the crisis more urgently and effectively. As the situation in Gaza continues to deteriorate, it is crucial that leaders like Trump use their influence to advocate for policies that prioritize human life and dignity while keeping military objectives in line. Only then can the cycle of suffering be broken, and a path towards peace and stability be forged.