This Video Shows Just How Deep The Rot Is

In partnership with

Master ChatGPT for Work Success

ChatGPT is revolutionizing how we work, but most people barely scratch the surface. Subscribe to Mindstream for free and unlock 5 essential resources including templates, workflows, and expert strategies for 2025. Whether you're writing emails, analyzing data, or streamlining tasks, this bundle shows you exactly how to save hours every week.

Subscribe for Your Free Bundle

Right here it is, it's all on video. The recent release of documents from Jeffrey Epstein's estate has shed light on a troubling exchange between the convicted sex offender and Democratic Representative Stacey Plaskett of the U.S. Virgin Islands during a critical 2019 House hearing involving Michael Cohen, Donald Trump's former attorney. This revelation, detailed in reports from major news outlets, has sparked significant concern and calls for accountability, particularly from Republican lawmakers who see it as evidence of Democratic coordination with Epstein to politically target Trump.

The context of this exchange is rooted in a February 2019 hearing of the House Oversight Committee, where Michael Cohen testified about his role in Trump's business dealings and the infamous hush-money payments made to adult film star Stormy Daniels. Cohen's testimony was part of a broader Democratic effort to investigate Trump, and it later played a role in the legal proceedings that led to Trump's conviction on related charges in 2024. During this hearing, newly released documents reveal that Jeffrey Epstein was actively texting with Rep. Plaskett, providing real-time advice on questions to ask Cohen, ostensibly to expose associates of the Trump Organization.

The Washington Post's analysis of these documents, which included matching timestamps of the texts with video footage from the hearing, identified Plaskett as the member of Congress in contact with Epstein. The texts show Epstein watching the hearing live and offering strategic insights, such as when he informed Plaskett that Cohen had mentioned former Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff. This led to Plaskett's follow-up questions during the hearing, raising questions about the influence Epstein may have had on the proceedings.

One particularly disturbing text from Epstein to Plaskett read, "Are you chewing," which coincided with a moment in the live feed where Plaskett appeared to be chewing, suggesting a level of real-time interaction that is deeply concerning. Other messages included discussions about "RONA," referring to Graff, and prompts for Plaskett to ask about other potential Trump associates. These exchanges paint a picture of coordination that has alarmed many, especially given Epstein's notorious background and the serious allegations against him.The release of these documents came as part of a larger disclosure by the House Oversight Committee, which made public over 20,000 pages of Epstein's estate records. This move was part of an ongoing effort to transparency and accountability, particularly in light of Epstein's connections to powerful figures and the potential implications for national security and public trust. The timing of this release, just before the 2025 elections, has added to the political tension surrounding the issue.

Republicans, led by figures like Senator John Kennedy, have been vocal in their demand for Plaskett to explain her actions. Kennedy's call for her to "explain it" underscores the gravity with which many view this situation, seeing it as a potential abuse of power and a breach of ethical standards. The concern is not just about the content of the texts but also about the broader implications of a convicted sex offender influencing congressional proceedings, especially in a context aimed at discrediting a former president. The rot is deep.

Plaskett's office has responded by stating that the texts were unsolicited and that she was not in a position to confirm or deny the interaction during the hearing. They have emphasized her role as a vocal advocate against human trafficking, suggesting that her engagement with Epstein was part of a broader effort to gather information on such issues. However, this explanation has done little to quell the controversy, as the optics of a Democratic representative communicating with Epstein during a high-stakes hearing are deeply troubling to many.

The fallout from this revelation has been significant, with calls for Plaskett to be stripped of her committee assignments and for a thorough investigation into the extent of Epstein's influence on congressional activities. The episode has also reignited discussions about the broader network of Epstein's associates and the potential for his actions to have impacted political and legal proceedings against Trump. It serves as a stark reminder of the complex intersections of power, influence, and accountability in American politics.

In conclusion, the video evidence and accompanying documents provide a disturbing glimpse into the interaction between Jeffrey Epstein and Representative Stacey Plaskett during a critical 2019 House hearing. The real-time advice Epstein offered, aimed at exposing Trump associates, has raised serious questions about the integrity of the proceedings and the potential for undue influence. Influence by a potential foreign agent who also allegedly had ties to the our own deep state.

What we just saw here should anger every American, regardless of party.