The Haunting Image Seen Around The Nation

In partnership with

It’s go-time for holiday campaigns

Roku Ads Manager makes it easy to extend your Q4 campaign to performance CTV.

You can:

• Easily launch self-serve CTV ads

• Repurpose your social content for TV

• Drive purchases directly on-screen with shoppable ads

• A/B test to discover your most effective offers

The holidays only come once a year. Get started now with a $500 ad credit when you spend your first $500 today with code: ROKUADS500. Terms apply.

Get started today.

It's the image seen around the nation, but yet no mainstream news outlet has reported on it. On August 22, 2025, a horrific incident unfolded on a Charlotte, North Carolina, Lynx Blue Line train, where 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska was brutally stabbed to death by Decarlos Brown Jr., a 34-year-old repeat offender with a documented history of violent crime and mental illness. Surveillance footage captured the unprovoked attack in chilling detail: Zarutska, absorbed in her phone, was suddenly assaulted with a folding knife, suffering multiple stabs, including a fatal blow to her throat. She collapsed as Brown casually walked away, leaving a trail of blood and a community in shock. Despite the video amassing over 22 million views online, major news organizations—CNN, The New York Times, NPR, PBS, The Wall Street Journal, BBC, The Washington Post, Reuters, and MSNBC—have remained conspicuously silent. This deafening absence of coverage exposes a troubling bias within the mainstream media, a bias that prioritizes narrative over truth and has left a grieving community without the attention it deserves.

The facts of the Charlotte incident are stark and undeniable. Iryna Zarutska had fled the war-torn streets of Ukraine seeking safety in the United States, only to meet a violent end on a public transit system that failed to protect her. Decarlos Brown Jr., with over a dozen prior arrests including armed robbery and a diagnosis of schizophrenia, had been released on a no-cash bail despite alarming behavior, including bizarre claims of being controlled by implanted substances. The attack, lasting mere seconds, was marked by its randomness—Zarutska had no interaction with her assailant prior to the assault. Local authorities and the Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS) have since acknowledged systemic failures, with plans to enhance security and police presence on trains. Yet, beyond local reports, the national media has turned a blind eye, a decision that reeks of selective reporting driven by an agenda.

This silence is particularly galling when compared to the media’s obsessive coverage of other incidents that align more comfortably with their preferred narratives. Take the 2019 Jussie Smollett case, where the actor staged a fake hate crime, claiming he was attacked by Trump supporters in Chicago. For weeks, outlets like CNN, MSNBC, and The New York Times devoted countless hours and column inches to the story, framing it as evidence of rising hate crimes and racial tension—despite the eventual revelation that it was a hoax. The Smollett saga received saturation coverage, with analysts and pundits dissecting every detail, while the Charlotte stabbing, a real and devastating crime, has been met with crickets. The disparity is staggering: a fabricated incident garnered more attention than the brutal murder of a young refugee, suggesting that the media’s interest hinges not on the severity of the act but on its utility in pushing a preconceived storyline.

The reason for this omission is clear: the Charlotte attack doesn’t fit the mainstream media’s narrative. Major outlets have long been accused of shaping news to reflect progressive ideologies, often downplaying crimes that challenge their portrayal of urban safety or racial dynamics. In this case, the perpetrator’s criminal history and mental health issues, coupled with the victim’s status as a white refugee, complicate the media’s typical framing of crime as a byproduct of systemic racism or poverty. Instead of exploring the failures of judicial oversight or the need for better mental health interventions—issues that transcend political lines—these outlets appear to have opted for silence, fearing it might disrupt their carefully curated narrative or alienate their audience. This is not journalism; it is propaganda by omission.

Let’s examine the bias of each major outlet individually, for their collective silence is a disgrace. CNN, once a beacon of breaking news, has instead filled its airtime with speculative political hit pieces, ignoring a story that demands scrutiny of local governance. The New York Times, with its self-proclaimed commitment to truth, has buried its head in the sand, prioritizing opinion columns over hard news when it suits its editorial board. NPR and PBS, funded by public dollars, have a duty to serve all citizens, yet they’ve shirked that responsibility, focusing on cultural fluff while a murder goes unreported. The Wall Street Journal, typically focused on economic matters, could have explored the fiscal implications of inadequate transit security but chose irrelevance instead. BBC, with its global reach, has overlooked an international angle involving a Ukrainian refugee, a story that should resonate worldwide. The Washington Post, known for its investigative prowess, has failed to investigate a local tragedy with national implications. Reuters, a wire service meant to provide raw data, has withheld the story from its global clients. And MSNBC, a platform for progressive outrage, has remained mute on an issue that doesn’t stoke its usual partisan fires.

This selective coverage is a betrayal of the public trust. The media’s refusal to report on the Charlotte stabbing suggests a deliberate effort to shield certain narratives—perhaps to avoid highlighting the failures of progressive policies like no-cash bail or to prevent fueling debates about crime and immigration that might benefit conservative viewpoints. The result is a skewed public discourse where fabricated hate crimes receive more attention than genuine atrocities. Iryna Zarutska’s death deserves more than viral videos and local outrage; it demands a national conversation about safety, justice, and the media’s role in informing it. Until these outlets abandon their bias and confront uncomfortable truths, they will remain complicit in the very problems they claim to address. The image of Zarutska’s final moments may have gone viral, but the media’s silence ensures her story remains unheard—a travesty that should shame every newsroom in America.