- American Realist
- Posts
- Russiagate Indictments Coming "Hillary Clinton a Target"
Russiagate Indictments Coming "Hillary Clinton a Target"
Trump is done playing around.
Learn from this investor’s $100m mistake
In 2010, a Grammy-winning artist passed on investing $200K in an emerging real estate disruptor. That stake could be worth $100+ million today.
One year later, another real estate disruptor, Zillow, went public. This time, everyday investors had regrets, missing pre-IPO gains.
Now, a new real estate innovator, Pacaso – founded by a former Zillow exec – is disrupting a $1.3T market. And unlike the others, you can invest in Pacaso as a private company.
Pacaso’s co-ownership model has generated $1B+ in luxury home sales and service fees, earned $110M+ in gross profits to date, and received backing from the same VCs behind Uber, Venmo, and eBay. They even reserved the Nasdaq ticker PCSO.
Paid advertisement for Pacaso’s Regulation A offering. Read the offering circular at invest.pacaso.com. Reserving a ticker symbol is not a guarantee that the company will go public. Listing on the NASDAQ is subject to approvals.

About time.
In a recent interview on "The Chris Cuomo Project," journalist Matt Taibbi dropped a bombshell that has reignited discussions about the Russiagate scandal and its lingering implications for American politics. Taibbi, known for his incisive reporting and deep dives into political controversies, suggested that significant indictments are on the horizon, with Hillary Clinton potentially in the crosshairs. This revelation comes at a time when the nation is still grappling with the aftermath of one of the most divisive periods in recent history, and it underscores the urgency of addressing these issues to ensure accountability and national healing.
Taibbi's comments during the interview were both cautious and pointed. He expressed skepticism about the likelihood of indictments just a few weeks prior, but recent information from his sources has shifted his perspective. "I think there are going to be indictments," Taibbi stated, emphasizing that failing to pursue legal action would represent a "massive political failure" for those involved. His sources, described as individuals within the FBI and DOJ, have reportedly indicated that the focus is not merely on winning public opinion but on delivering justice through the courtroom.The most startling aspect of Taibbi's revelation is the mention of Hillary Clinton as a potential target. He noted, "I keep being told that Hillary Clinton is actually a target in these investigations. It may turn out that … her original email situation will be wrapped into some kind of conspiracy case."
👀 Matt Taibbi Says Russiagate Indictments Are Coming, Hillary Clinton May Be a Target
“I keep being told that Hillary Clinton is actually a target in these investigations. It may turn out that … her original email situation will be wrapped into some kind of conspiracy case.”
— Chief Nerd (@TheChiefNerd)
11:01 PM • Aug 12, 2025
This statement refers to the long-standing controversy surrounding Clinton's use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State, an issue that has been both a political lightning rod and a focal point for legal scrutiny. Despite previous investigations by the FBI concluding that no information on Clinton's server was clearly marked as classified, the persistence of this narrative suggests that new angles or evidence might be emerging.The implications of such indictments are profound. Russiagate, which dominated headlines for years, involved allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian entities to influence the 2016 presidential election. While the Mueller Report ultimately found no evidence of collusion, it did confirm Russian interference efforts, highlighting a vulnerability in the American electoral process. The scandal has left a deep scar on the nation's political landscape, eroding trust in institutions and exacerbating partisan divisions.
Taibbi's interview with Chris Cuomo suggests that the current administration, potentially influenced by figures like Pam Bondi and Kash Patel, is intent on revisiting these events. The journalist's cautious optimism about the possibility of indictments indicates a shift towards a more aggressive stance on accountability. However, he also expressed uncertainty about the specific charges, noting, "I just don't know what for. I mean, I think that's a very important question to ask." This uncertainty underscores the complexity of the case, which involves a web of actors and actions that span multiple agencies and years.The necessity of these indictments cannot be overstated. For the country to heal from the wounds inflicted by Russiagate, there must be a clear demonstration that such actions, which border on treason, will not go unpunished. Treason, as defined by the U.S. Constitution, involves levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. While the actions in question may not meet the strict legal definition of treason, the intent to undermine the electoral process and manipulate public opinion for political gain represents a grave threat to democratic integrity.
Holding individuals accountable, including high-profile figures like Hillary Clinton, is crucial for several reasons. First, it reaffirms the principle that no one is above the law, a cornerstone of American democracy. Second, it serves as a deterrent against future attempts to subvert the electoral process. Third, it provides a measure of closure for a nation that has been divided and disillusioned by the events of recent years.Critics might argue that revisiting Russiagate is merely a political maneuver, a way to settle old scores. However, Taibbi's comments suggest a different narrative—one driven by a genuine pursuit of justice rather than partisan vendettas. His role as a journalist who has consistently challenged narratives from both sides of the political spectrum lends credibility to his claims. Moreover, the involvement of current FBI and DOJ officials indicates that this is not a fringe effort but a serious legal undertaking.
The path forward is fraught with challenges. The legal and political landscape is complex, and the stakes are high. Yet, the potential for indictments offers a glimmer of hope that the country can move towards a more transparent and accountable future. As Taibbi cautioned, "I would caution people not to think there's anything there yet before we see it," but the mere possibility that justice might be served is a step in the right direction. And to take it one step further, the Trump Administration owes his voters this. So they must deliver justice.
In conclusion, Matt Taibbi's revelations on "The Chris Cuomo Project" about impending indictments in the Russiagate scandal, with Hillary Clinton as a potential target, highlight the ongoing efforts to address one of the most significant political controversies of our time. Never forget the amount of propaganda we lived through. These actions are not just about punishing past deeds but about ensuring that the nation can heal and move forward with a renewed commitment to democratic principles. The road to accountability is long and uncertain, but it is a necessary journey for the sake of the country's future.
Do you want to see Russiagate indictments happen, or should we move on as a country? |