'It's Not Just A Flaw, It's Deceptive'

To support this newsletter, check out our advertiser Javaburn. The world’s first and only natural proprietary, patent-pending formula, that when combined with coffee, can increase both the speed and efficiency of your metabolism.

Inflation, the rate at which the general level of prices for goods and services rises, directly affects everyone—from the individual consumer to the largest corporations. However, there is growing concern about the methodology the U.S. government uses to calculate inflation on a yearly basis, particularly around the issue that it fails to account for cumulative inflation growth. This method of calculation can be misleading, painting an incomplete picture of the economic reality many Americans face, especially those struggling with rising costs.

Each year, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) releases the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is used as a key measure to gauge inflation by tracking changes in the prices paid by consumers for a basket of goods and services. This index is pivotal for economic policy decisions, adjustments in wages, and for guiding businesses in pricing strategies. However, the CPI calculation focuses on the change from one year to the next without reflecting the compounding effect of inflation over multiple years.

The primary issue with this approach is its deceptive simplicity. For example, if inflation rates are reported at 2% annually over a three-year period, the cumulative effect isn't just 6% but slightly more due to the compounding nature of price increases. Over time, these small variances can add up, meaning the actual cost-of-living increase faced by consumers can be significantly understated in government reports.

This methodological oversight does not capture the true erosion of purchasing power that accumulates over time, particularly affecting lower and middle-income families who spend a larger proportion of their income on essentials such as housing, food, and healthcare. For these households, even a small underestimation in the rate of inflation can mean the difference between financial stability and hardship.

Moreover, the yearly calculation can mask spikes in prices of certain essential goods. For instance, if housing costs or medical expenses surge dramatically in a given year, the impact on individuals can be acute. However, if those increases moderate somewhat in the following year, the overall statistical picture might suggest stabilization, despite the fact that prices remain significantly higher than they were two years prior.

Just take a look at this quick explanation to get the full grasp of the deceptive nature of how the government is lying to us.

Critics argue that this approach to measuring inflation is not just a technical flaw—it's deceptive. It provides policymakers and the public with a smoothed-over view of inflation, leading to complacency in economic policy and monetary strategy. This can result in delayed responses from central banks and governments, who rely on these figures to make decisions about interest rates, social security adjustments, and more.

The need for a more accurate inflation measure is clear. Americans are FEELING the pain, there’s no doubt about that. If actual inflation from just 3 years ago is over 20% and the government is making us feel like it’s 2% due to their ‘formulas’ that’s just plain wrong.

While the current method of calculating inflation serves its purpose for year-to-year economic assessments, it falls short of providing a complete picture of the ongoing challenges posed by rising costs. For a true reflection of economic conditions—a reflection that captures the lived experiences of average Americans—revising this approach to account for cumulative inflation is not just beneficial but necessary. By doing so, we can foster a more equitable economic strategy that more accurately aligns with the realities faced by all sectors of the population.

Tell us what you think in the poll below, and see how others are feeling as well. Are you feeling the pressure of significantly higher costs and inflation?