MAGA Is Turning On Her, And For Good Reason

In partnership with

The news site that doesn’t cater to your beliefs. Or try to sell you theirs.

Instead, Ground News shows you how left, center, and right-leaning outlets are covering the same story—so you can easily compare reporting and get a well-rounded perspective on the issues that matter to you.

Join 1M+ readers from all political persuasions who use Ground News to see the news, the world, and themselves a little clearer.

Start your free trial today

The conservative movement in the United States is reeling from a profound betrayal at the hands of one of its own—Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Appointed to the Supreme Court by President Donald Trump in 2020 with the fervent support of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) base, Barrett was hailed as a beacon of hope for restoring constitutional integrity and conservative principles to a judiciary increasingly swayed by liberal activism. Yet, her tenure has devolved into a disgraceful abandonment of the values that propelled her to the bench.

Far from being a steadfast defender of Trump’s America-First agenda, Barrett has emerged as a treacherous figure, aligning herself with the radical left and undermining the very people who fought tooth and nail to secure her confirmation. Her record is a shameful testament to ingratitude and ideological cowardice, leaving MAGA supporters furious and disillusioned. The most damning evidence of Barrett’s treachery lies in her voting patterns since joining the Supreme Court. Data from her second term reveals an astonishing 82% alignment with liberal justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, a staggering leap from the 39% agreement rate during her first term.

This shift is no mere coincidence—it’s a deliberate pivot away from the conservative principles she was expected to uphold. MAGA supporters, who endured a grueling confirmation battle to see her seated, believed they were getting a warrior for their cause. Instead, they got a turncoat who has cozied up to the progressive wing of the court, casting votes that defy the America-First ethos. This isn’t judicial independence; it’s judicial betrayal, plain and simple. One of the most egregious examples of Barrett’s anti-conservative record came with her vote to block Trump’s attempt to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid through the USAID program. This decision was a direct assault on the fiscal discipline and national priorities that MAGA champions. While American taxpayers struggle with crumbling infrastructure, porous borders, and economic stagnation, Barrett chose to prioritize handouts to foreign nations over the needs of her own countrymen.

This ruling was a gut punch to the movement, exposing her as a globalist sympathizer masquerading as a conservative. Her justification—rooted in some convoluted legal reasoning—smacks of elitist ivory-tower nonsense, detached from the real-world concerns of the people who backed her. Even more infuriating is Barrett’s apparent reluctance to support Trump in cases involving the former president himself. As the leader who handpicked her to safeguard his legacy, Trump deserved loyalty from a justice he entrusted with such a critical role. Yet, Barrett has proven to be the least likely conservative justice to stand by him, a fact that has MAGA supporters seething.

This isn’t about blind partisanship; it’s about honoring the mandate given to her by the man who defied all odds to place her on the highest court. Her refusal to back Trump reveals a spinelessness that betrays the bold leadership the movement demands. Barrett’s record on other high-profile issues further cements her status as a disappointment. Take her handling of cases related to the January 6 defendants, where she upheld draconian sentences despite clear evidence of government overreach and entrapment. For a justice appointed to protect individual liberties, her rulings have instead empowered a corrupt system to punish political dissenters. This isn’t the behavior of a conservative champion—it’s the mark of a judicial quisling, more interested in currying favor with the establishment than defending the rights of ordinary Americans.

The irony of Barrett’s betrayal is compounded by her own background. Touted as a devout Catholic with a large family, including adopted children, she was sold to the public as a moral bedrock for the court. Yet, her actions suggest a hollow faith, one that bends to the whims of liberal ideology rather than the principles she claims to hold dear. Critics on the right have not hesitated to call her out, labeling her a “DEI judge” and questioning her commitment to the conservative cause. These accusations sting because they ring true—Barrett’s record shows she is more aligned with the progressive elite than with the grassroots warriors who fought for her.

The architects of her appointment, including influential conservative operatives, must shoulder some blame for this fiasco. They championed her as a sure bet, only to see her unravel into a liability. But the lion’s share of the responsibility lies with Barrett herself. She had a golden opportunity to solidify the Supreme Court’s 6-3 conservative majority and push back against decades of judicial overreach. Instead, she has squandered that chance, leaving MAGA to wonder if they were duped from the start. The time has come for accountability.

Barrett’s anti-conservative record is a stain on the judiciary and a slap in the face to every patriot who believed in her. Calls for her resignation are growing louder, and rightfully so. The Supreme Court cannot afford to harbor a justice who so blatantly undermines the movement that elevated her. MAGA demands justices who are fearless, loyal, and unapologetically committed to putting America first—not weak-kneed academics who cave to liberal pressure. Amy Coney Barrett has proven herself unfit for the role, and her continued presence on the bench is an insult to the values she was sworn to uphold. It’s time for her to step down and make way for a true conservative warrior.