Judge's Ruling Could Disrupt Payments To Millions

We're fighting for common sense journalism. We know what the mainstream media is capable off and we know that the next four years will be some of the most important in our nation's history. For as little as $5/month, help us fight back against mainstream media propaganda. Your contribution helps us grow and makes sure that common sense wins against manufactured mainstream media narratives.

The battle between the Trump administration and the activist federal judiciary hit a new level this week when U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander issued a sweeping 137-page injunction to block Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing sensitive systems at the Social Security Administration (SSA). On its face, this ruling is being sold as a win for “privacy” by the usual cast of Democrat-aligned unions and advocacy groups. But when you look closer, it’s clear what’s actually happening: another unelected judge is stepping in to block President Trump’s efforts to clean up a bloated, unaccountable federal bureaucracy.

The lawsuit, brought by labor unions, retirees, and the left-wing activist group Democracy Forward, claims DOGE's efforts to investigate fraud and inefficiencies at SSA are invasive and reckless. Judge Hollander sided with them, accusing DOGE of a "fishing expedition" and likening it to "hitting a fly with a sledgehammer." She barred DOGE from accessing anything beyond anonymized data and even ordered the destruction of any personal data it had already obtained. Her ruling would prevent DOGE from installing software, gaining meaningful system access, or continuing its oversight mission—unless it can jump through hoops and get “approved” later, under arbitrary conditions.

Let’s be honest—this ruling is yet another deliberate attempt to hamstring Trump’s agenda, plain and simple. Just look at this insane graphic to see just how much of a roadblock to the Trump administration’s agenda these activist judges are. And this isn’t even counting the slew of federal injunctions we had in March.

Elon Musk’s DOGE was created specifically to root out fraud, waste, and abuse across the federal government, and the SSA was always going to be one of its top targets. Anyone who's been paying attention knows the Social Security system has been plagued by outdated infrastructure, poor oversight, and shocking levels of waste. DOGE was formed to fix that, and now, the left is panicking.

What made headlines wasn’t just the ruling itself, but the Trump administration’s response—and it’s kind of a big deal on the grand scheme of things. Acting SSA Commissioner Lee Dudek didn’t mince words. He made it clear that if the agency is forced to follow this sweeping and vague ruling to the letter, it could require shutting down SSA's IT systems entirely, which would disrupt benefit payments to over 70 million Americans. Think about that—a single federal judge’s ruling could freeze the flow of Social Security benefits to millions, not because of Trump, but because of the judicial roadblocks being thrown up to stop his reform efforts.

President Trump wasted no time calling out the decision for what it is—judicial sabotage. Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields rightly labeled Judge Hollander as a “radical, leftist judge” and reaffirmed the administration’s commitment to using every legal avenue to fight back. That’s the right approach. These judges are not the guardians of democracy they pretend to be—they’re part of a broader resistance movement aimed at nullifying the will of the voters by entrenching unelected bureaucrats and special interests.

Of course, the same people who lecture us about "democracy" and "norms" are the ones now cheering on an unelected judge for derailing the president’s reform efforts. These are the same activists who howled about privacy concerns while ignoring the mountain of evidence showing systemic mismanagement at the SSA—the kind that costs taxpayers billions and deprives vulnerable Americans of the help they were promised.

But here's the key point: President Trump isn’t backing down, as he shouldn’t. These ruling are getting ridiculous. The administration is preparing to appeal, and you can expect this case to go all the way to the Supreme Court if needed. The White House is also pushing Congress to act—to either clarify DOGE's authority or rein in rogue judges who have taken it upon themselves to become the final word on federal policy. Because this isn’t just about SSA or DOGE—it’s about whether the elected President of the United States can do the job the people hired him to do.

If Congress sits on its hands while activist judges tie the president’s hands, then they’re complicit in the sabotage. It’s time to stop pretending this is about “checks and balances.” This is about activist judges becoming unaccountable tyrants, overriding not only the executive branch but the will of the people. President Trump was elected with a mandate. Nobody cast a vote for these federal judges.

The ruling by Judge Hollander should be a wake-up call to every American who believes in limited government, accountability, and the rule of law. The Trump administration's bold response shows that they're not going to roll over and let unelected judges dictate policy. This is about restoring control to the people, and breaking the shackles of bureaucracy.

And if that threatens the cozy arrangements of federal lifers and activist judges? Well, maybe that’s exactly what this country needs.