GOP Senator Considering "Becoming A Democrat"

In partnership with

Get access to the most exclusive offers for private market investors

Looking to invest in real estate, private credit, pre-IPO venture or crypto? AIR Insiders get exclusive offers and perks from leading private market investing tools and platforms, like:

• Up to $250 free from Percent

• 50% off tax and retirement planning from Carry

• $50 of free stock from Public

• A free subscription to Worth Magazine

• $1000 off an annual subscription to DealSheet

• and offers from CapitalPad, Groundfloor, Fundrise, Mogul, and more.

Just sign up for our 2-week free trial to experience all the benefits of being an AIR Insider.

Sign Up For Free

The political landscape in the United States has been rocked by yet another self-serving maneuver from Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, who has openly mused about abandoning the Republican Party to caucus with Democrats as an Independent. This shameless pivot is not a surprise to those who have watched her career unfold with growing dismay. Murkowski, a senator whose tenure has been marred by a consistent disregard for conservative principles, has once again proven herself to be a treacherous figure within the GOP, prioritizing personal ambition over the values she swore to uphold.

Murkowski’s potential defection is the culmination of years of disloyalty. Long branded a Republican In Name Only (RINO), her voting record reveals a disturbing pattern of aligning with liberal agendas, from supporting key Democratic judicial nominees to opposing conservative stalwarts like Brett Kavanaugh during his Supreme Court confirmation. This isn’t the behavior of a committed Republican; it’s the calculated posturing of a politician more interested in maintaining her D.C. elite status than serving the interests of her constituents or her party.

Her latest threat to ditch the GOP for a Democratic caucus is less a bold ideological shift and more a cowardly retreat from the accountability that comes with being a true conservative in an increasingly polarized Senate. The roots of this betrayal trace back to her unearned entry into the Senate. Appointed by her father, former Alaska Governor Frank Murkowski, in 2002 to fill his vacant seat, Lisa’s political career began as a product of nepotism rather than merit. This dynastic handoff, a rare and questionable practice in American politics, set the stage for a senator who has never fully earned the trust of her party.

Her survival in the 2010 election, when she ran as a write-in candidate after losing the Republican primary, only deepened the perception of entitlement. Relying on Alaska’s controversial ranked-choice voting system—a mechanism that critics argue dilutes the voice of traditional conservatives—Murkowski clung to power, defying the will of the GOP base that had rejected her. Her recent comments about considering a move to the Democratic caucus, potentially mirroring the opportunistic path of Bernie Sanders, expose a woman unmoored from principle. Murkowski has described herself as “independently minded,” a euphemism that masks her unwillingness to stand firm on the conservative platform that elected her.

This isn’t independence; it’s opportunism. By flirting with the idea of caucusing with Democrats, she threatens to tip the Senate’s fragile balance, handing leverage to the left at a time when Republicans are fighting to advance an America First agenda. Her actions are a direct assault on the party that has tolerated her deviations for far too long. Murkowski’s tenure has been marked by a troubling neglect of her home state’s needs. While Alaska grapples with crumbling infrastructure and economic challenges, she has focused on performative resistance to her own party, aligning with liberal causes that do little to address the real concerns of Alaskans.

Her criticism of the current political climate and vague references to “retaliation” suggest a victimhood complex, as if her own choices haven’t fueled the backlash she now faces. This is a senator who has squandered her position, using it as a platform for personal branding rather than a bulwark for conservative governance. The Republican Party must view this as a wake-up call. Murkowski’s potential exit, while a loss in numbers, could purge a corrosive influence that has undermined the GOP from within. Her departure would signal to other wavering moderates that loyalty to party values is non-negotiable. Yet, the damage she could inflict by switching sides is significant—potentially empowering Democrats to push through radical policies that Republicans have fought to block. This is not the act of a stateswoman but of a turncoat, willing to sell out her allies for a seat at the table of the opposing camp. Alaskans, too, deserve better.

They elected a Republican, not a chameleon who shifts colors with the political winds. The ranked-choice voting system that has propped her up must be reevaluated, as it has enabled a senator more aligned with the D.C. establishment than with the people she represents. Murkowski’s legacy will not be one of service but of betrayal—a cautionary tale of a politician who chose power over principle. In the end, Lisa Murkowski’s flirtation with leaving the Republican Party is a disgraceful abandonment of the trust placed in her. The GOP must move forward without her, learning from this episode to root out similar disloyalty. For Murkowski, history will judge her not as a maverick but as a traitor who turned her back on the party that gave her a platform.