Bernie Makes Stunning DNC Admission

In partnership with

Had Enough Of One-Sided News?

Us too … and that’s why we like Tangle.

In a world full of partisan opinions, biased arguments, clickbait, and more, Tangle offers a refreshing approach to the news: They tackle one big topic in American politics, five days a week, and approach it from multiple perspectives across the political spectrum. They package all these insights and arguments up into a 10-minute read, drop it in your inbox, and let you do the rest.

Recent examples include: A breakdown of Joe Biden pardoning his son, an explanation of what just happened in Syria, and the arguments for and against Trump's push to end birthright citizenship.

The end result? A 360-degree view of each issue that guarantees you have the information to form your own opinion. How refreshing.

Join the 375,000+ independent thinkers who subscribe to Tangle right here.

Start reading.

In a recent podcast appearance, Senator Bernie Sanders made a startling admission that has reignited debates about the integrity of the Democratic Party's primary process. During a conversation with comedian Akaash Singh and Andrew Shultz, Sanders acknowledged that there hasn't been a fair primary within the Democratic Party since 2008, implicitly agreeing with the notion that the party itself poses a threat to democracy.

This admission is particularly poignant given Sanders' own tumultuous experiences with the 2016 and 2020 primaries, where he felt the process was manipulated against him. Moreover, Sanders revealed that his wife was against his endorsement of the Democratic nominee in 2016, citing the belief that the primary election was stolen from him. This confession, coming from a long-time figurehead of the progressive wing of the Democrats, underscores a deep-seated frustration with the party's internal mechanisms and raises questions about its commitment to democratic principles.

You’ve simply gotta watch this short clip.

The irony of Sanders' position is not lost on observers. Here is a man who has spent decades advocating for socialist policies within the Democratic Party, yet he now admits that the very party he supports has failed to uphold democratic standards. This admission is particularly damning because it comes at a time when the Democratic Party has been vocal about accusing Republicans of being a threat to democracy, especially in the context of the 2024 election and beyond. Sanders' words suggest a hypocrisy that has long been pointed out: the Democratic Party's actions seldom align with its words. If the party cannot ensure a fair primary process for its own members, how can it claim to be the guardian of democratic values on a national scale?

Adding to the intrigue, this podcast episode is not an isolated incident. Just a few months ago, President Donald Trump appeared on the same platform, engaging in a discussion that highlighted his own critiques of the political establishment. Trump's presence on the podcast, followed by Sanders' admission, creates a fascinating juxtaposition. Both figures, despite their ideological differences, have expressed disillusionment with aspects of the political system. However, while Sanders ultimately chose to sell out and work within the system, Trump's approach has been to disrupt it entirely, a strategy that resonated with many voters in 2016 and 2024.

Sanders' revelation about his wife's opposition to his endorsement of the Democratic nominee in 2016 adds a personal dimension to this political critique. It suggests a level of internal conflict and doubt that many believe is indicative of broader issues within the party. If even Sanders, a lifelong Democrat and a key figure in the progressive movement, feels that the primary was stolen from him, what does that say about the trust and transparency within the party, and more importantly, the system more broadly? This personal anecdote reinforces the narrative that the Democratic Party is more concerned with maintaining its grip on power than with ensuring a fair and open process for all its members. The admission also validates concerns about the Democratic Party's use of superdelegates, the strategic timing of debates, and the influence of party elites, which have been points of contention, particularly during Sanders' runs for the nomination.

His acknowledgment that these processes have been unfair since 2008 aligns with arguments that the Democratic Party prioritizes establishment candidates over grassroots movements, thereby stifling genuine democratic choice. This is not merely a theoretical concern; it has practical implications, as evidenced by Sanders' own campaigns, where he believed the system was rigged against him. Furthermore, the context of this discussion is enriched by the historical backdrop of the Democratic Party's primary processes and Sanders' past support for Tulsi Gabbard, who also faced similar criticisms during her 2020 presidential run. This pattern of concern about democratic processes within the party suggests a systemic issue that goes beyond individual campaigns.

The realist perspective on Sanders' admission is one of cautious optimism mixed with skepticism. On one hand, it is encouraging to see a prominent Democrat acknowledge the flaws within his party (and our institutions more broadly), as it opens the door for a broader discussion about electoral integrity across the political spectrum. On the other hand, there is skepticism about whether this admission will lead to meaningful reform within the Democratic Party. Spoiler alert, definitely not. Mostly because the Democratic Party is filled with weak people who can only stand in line and do what they’re told. For goodness sake, they gave us Joe Biden as President! We can’t forget that.

Historically, opposing critiques from within have been met with swift and powerful resistance, and there is little indication that the party establishment will heed Sanders' words. Instead, there is a fear that the Democratic Party will continue to prioritize power over principle, using its influence to maintain control rather than to foster genuine democracy. In conclusion, Bernie Sanders' admission on the podcast is a significant moment that warrants careful consideration. It highlights the internal contradictions within the Democratic Party and raises serious questions about its commitment to democratic principles. Coupled with the revelation about his wife's stance and the context of Trump's recent appearance on the same platform, it paints a picture of a political landscape where trust in the system is eroding, even among its most dedicated participants. Whether Sanders' words will lead to reform remains to be seen, but they undoubtedly provide ammunition for those who argue that the Democratic Party's actions do not match its rhetoric. As the 2028 election cycle approaches, this admission could play a crucial role in shaping the narrative around democracy and party politics in America.